The U.S. financial market, underpinned by both the principles of democracy and free market capitalism, may be at risk due to a growing public trust deficit. The root of this erosion of trust is found in suspicious stock trading activities among prominent American lawmakers. The potential conflict of interest these activities present has not gone unnoticed, and questions are being raised about the ethics of such behavior, even if it is technically legal.

In the years following the 2008 financial crisis, the Pelosi’s’ estimated net worth jumped from $31 million to over $100 million – a 220% increase – while the S&P 500 fell by 13%. Furthermore, during the pandemic years, their net worth grew from $106 million to $171 million, marking a 60% increase. No evidence suggests insider trading or other foul play, yet the correlation between political power and significant wealth accumulation presents a striking image.

It is true that people should have the freedom to invest as they wish. However, when lawmakers who handle privileged information see their wealth grow significantly during financial meltdowns, it can cause public unease.

Further suspicious incidents have been noted, like when the Pelosis sold Google stocks worth $3 million just before the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its antitrust lawsuit against Google. Also concerning was Paul Pelosi’s Tesla stock purchases, coinciding with Nancy Pelosi passing laws favoring electric vehicle subsidies, and his subsequent selling of Nvidia stock just before the U.S. government announced trade restrictions affecting chipmakers.

These instances have not only raised eyebrows, but they’ve also spawned a new trend. Some investors are now mimicking the trading activities of the Pelosis, viewing them as a proven strategy for success. This has even led to Nancy Pelosi becoming a meme within the investor community.

The Pelosi’s aren’t alone in these questionable practices. Republican Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, former Senator Kelly Loeffler, Senator Dianne Feinstein, and former Senator David Perdue have all been implicated in various instances of suspiciously timed trades.

In 2012, the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act was introduced to prevent such behavior. Despite its seemingly robust name, the STOCK Act proved weak in practice. Fines for non-disclosure or insider trading are minimal and don’t pose a real deterrent for lawmakers who can profit substantially from their privileged information. Despite at least 78 instances of overt violations of the STOCK Act, no lawmaker has faced any meaningful consequences.

Lawmakers themselves recognize the optics of their trading activities and have proposed bans on individual stock trading. However, these proposals have largely stalled due to the inherent conflict of interest of Congress regulating itself.

The underlying issue is trust. Government requires a level of trust in elected officials. Activities that even appear to take advantage of privileged information for personal financial gain significantly undermine this trust. Trust matters. The erosion of this trust is an erosion of democracy itself.

While it is essential that lawmakers have the freedom to participate in the free market, they must do so without leveraging privileged information or engaging in activities that create a conflict of interest. It is high time to address this issue, ensuring that a free market is also a fair market for everyone.

 

Floating Vimeo Video