As outrage swirled among University of Texas at Austin students last fall over the school’s alma mater, “The Eyes of Texas,” and its early association with campus minstrel shows, President Jay Hartzell made a classic higher education decision: He organized a committee.
This one, he said, would include 24 Longhorn athletes, historians, professors and students who would investigate and “chronicle the full history of ‘The Eyes’ and recommend ways we can openly acknowledge, share and learn from it.”
But by the time the group released its final report in March, a new name had quietly been added to its ranks: Brad Deutser, a Houston consultant who helps organizations with everything from company culture to crisis communications and branding.
In fact, UT-Austin had hired Deutser and his company to two contracts worth up to $1.1 million to revamp the image of the alma mater, along with broader organizational projects including a new communication and engagement strategy for the university, and defining “what it means to be a Longhorn,” according to copies of the contracts obtained by The Texas Tribune through an open records request.
Ultimately, the committee’s report concluded the intent of the song was “not overtly racist,” and could not find primary documents that tied the phrase to Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee, as previously asserted by some members of the school community.
Deutser’s involvement in the group’s work was so significant that he was listed as a board member and “Special Advisor to the President and Committee Chair” in its final report. UT-Austin officials didn’t respond to repeated inquiries seeking more information about Deutser’s role. But the committee’s chair, Richard Reddick, confirmed after this story’s publication that Deutser’s title meant he advised the committee chair, and was not a chair himself.
“Brad Deutser relentlessly supported our work by interviewing hundreds of members of Longhorn Nation, participating in our committee work, and orchestrating many of the products of the committee such as the videos — a truly dedicated Longhorn,” wrote Reddick, associate dean for equity, community engagement and outreach, in a letter accompanying the report.
Hartzell tasked the Eyes of Texas committee with researching and documenting the history of the song last November after a group of students and student-athletes demanded the school stop singing it in the wake of the death of George Floyd at the hands of police. Students have raised issues with the song’s origins, including that it premiered at a campus minstrel show where students likely wore blackface.
According to the contract, Deutser also was required to “align Eyes of Texas History Committee findings with cultural imperatives” and “leverage results to build out desired culture and necessary understanding.” He also was required to develop a communication strategy for the report.
Deutser, who is white, was also assigned to handle multiple diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, including to “develop the plan to create a more welcoming campus and community.” One particular task includes engaging with education leaders in Texas to “understand perspectives of black high school students.”
While Reddick was complimentary of Deutser’s work with the Eyes of Texas committee, multiple student leaders who met with Deutser and other university administrators throughout the spring semester said they had different takeaways from the meetings they attended.
Some students characterized the meetings held after the university’s report was released as “lectures” where they felt Deutser tried to convince them of the school’s position on the song, rather than foster a true dialogue or respond to student concerns. Other students said they were confused by his presence and felt like he didn’t take their opinions seriously.
“It was very much like he was trying to really convince us of what they thought, in terms of ‘this is what the song means,’” Brianna McBride, a recent graduate who led the Black President’s Leadership Council at UT-Austin, said.
Alcess No not, another recent UT graduate and former president of the UT Senate of College Councils, said she also attended some virtual meetings with Deutser after the Eyes of Texas report was released. She said hearing what the contract included now raises questions for her about the intent of those meetings.
“It just sounds like his job was to make sure that everyone was happy, and like the arguing would just stop,” she said. “If the goal was for him to bring students together, I don’t really know if that is what happened after the report was published.”
Hartzell declared the song would remain last July — months before the committee’s report was issued — while announcing a variety of diversity initiatives and changes to help make the campus a more welcoming place. The committee, he said, would allow the university to “fully own, acknowledge and teach about its school song.” The report ultimately confirmed the song debuted at a minstrel show, but could not find evidence directly linking the song to Confederate Army General Robert E. Lee, as was previously asserted by the song’s opponents.
“These historical facts add complexity and richness to the story of a song that debuted in a racist setting, exceedingly common for the time, but, as the preponderance of research showed, had no racist intent,” the report states in its executive summary. “‘The Eyes of Texas’ should not only unite us, but hold all of us accountable to our institution’s core values.”
Nonot said many students questioned the committee report’s findings after another UT-Austin professor, Alberto Martinez, released a second report that provided additional information and analysis about the song not included in the university’s report. Martinez asserts that his research shows the phrase “Eyes of Texas” is inspired by a story former UT-Austin President William Prather read about Gen. Lee, and was specifically written for a minstrel show.
The Black President’s Leadership Council, a group of leaders of Black student groups on campus, similarly slammed those meetings with university administration after Martinez’s report raised questions about the thoroughness of the information in UT-Austin’s report.